As expected, the chambers of
Morgantown City Council were full for Tuesday’s meeting because of the first
reading of a proposed ordinance regulating certain heavy truck traffic in the
city. Many people spoke in favor of the ordinance during the pubic portion of
the meeting such as Morgantown
resident Alex Baker who said he has nothing against the truckers themselves,
but believes large trucks on downtown streets are a safety hazard.
“I’m sure they are good people.
When they’re driving these vehicles, they have one particular need – deliver
their payload as quickly as possible from point A to point B, and if that
requires cutting off traffic, driving in reckless and dangerous methods, then
so be it,” he said.
Others went on to voice concerns
that have been expressed before, such as noise, air pollution and the need to
establish a truck route around the downtown area.
A minority of people spoke against
the ordinance based mostly on economic reasons. Mountain State
Truck Parts Manager Charley Benson said she feels the economic impact would
reach beyond the truckers.
“I don’t know if anybody’s
considered the impact economically. If you take the trucks off the streets of Morgantown , you’re not
just taking away business for trucks,” she said.
Discussion of the ordinance among
the council members lasted nearly as long as the public comment period of the
meeting. Council member Ron Bane said he has two major areas of concern should
the ordinance be passed.
“One, are we liable and two, are we
going to enforce it? I think those are fair questions to ask today.”
City Attorney Steve Fanok had an
answer for at least one of Bane’s issues.
“The legislative bodies, when they
enact an ordinance like this, or statute, there’s immunity for the legislative
body,” he said. Fanok also noted that there’s immunity for anyone who is
charged with enforcing the ordinance, such as police officers.
Bane asked City Manager Jeff
Mikorski to make sure the city has a plan in place for enforcing the ordinance
and other difficulties that would arise, such as signage along the affected
routes.
Noting that safety is the legal
basis for the ordinance, City Manager Jeff Mikorski asked the council for
permission to make sure that point is thoroughly covered.
“I would like to pursue a full
safety study of the routes that are in question. That would help us if and when
the ordinance would be challenged in the court of law,” he said.
Council member Bill Kawecki said
that, even though it is an emotional and contentious issue, the truck problem
has been around for a long time and can be solved by a democratic process.
“We need to do this because we need
to get together and cooperate and come up with solutions that are not just
money based and not just somebody else’s problems. They are community problems
and we need to solve them as a community,” he said.
The council passed the first
reading of the proposed ordinance by a vote of six to one with council member
Wes Nugent providing the dissenting vote.
“When I read the passages of state
code that are being cited, I come to a different conclusion. But I do agree
with the concept of trying to work to find a lasting sustainable solution,”
said Nugent.