The attorney general in Kentucky says he’s confident his state, West Virginia and ten other states will
prevail with a lawsuit challenging the federal Environmental Protection
Agency’s authority to limit carbon emissions from existing coal-fired power
plants.
Jack Conway said those with the
group, as a whole, are asking the U.S.
Court of Appeals in the District of
Columbia to answer a question.
“Look, can the EPA even do this?
And, if they can’t, let’s go ahead and get the injunctive relief to which we’re
entitled so the coal markets don’t suffer in the meantime,” he said.
“The harm is happening right now,”
said Conway of
why such legal relief is being sought long before the proposed regulations for
emissions, which the EPA released publicly in June, are finalized next year.
Their argument is the EPA already
regulates carbon dioxide under a different section of the Clean Water Act and
so such standards of performance for existing plants, established under Section
111(d) of the Clean Air Act, cannot be applied.
They’ve also contended West Virginia and Kentucky
stand to take the hardest hits from the new regulations.
EPA officials have said the goal of
the Clean Power Act is to reduce carbon emissions from existing coal-fired
power plants by a national average of 30 percent, compared with 2005 levels,
before 2030.
If the 645-page draft rule is
implemented, states would have different deadlines for meeting individualized
emission-reduction targets.
There’s some flexibility. States could meet their specific
targets by reducing energy demand through more energy efficiency programs, by
utilizing solar, wind energy or natural gas more or by installing
pollution-control technology.